WAIT. WHAT!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?

Kinja'd!!! "mr. idk" (mr-idk)
08/06/2013 at 14:26 • Filed to: AMG, MERCEDES, CHRYSLER, CROSSFIRE

Kinja'd!!!0 Kinja'd!!! 17
Kinja'd!!!

I didnt know that AMG assembled chrysler crossfire engines!!!!! I don't think its a fake badge because the AMG logo is imprinted on the supercharger, as you can see in the upper left corner. This might raise their value in a few decades, and I think Its surprisingly cool!


DISCUSSION (17)


Kinja'd!!! mr. idk > mr. idk
08/06/2013 at 14:27

Kinja'd!!!0


Kinja'd!!! DrJohannVegas > mr. idk
08/06/2013 at 14:28

Kinja'd!!!1

It's the C32/M112 engine. One of the few good things to come out of Daimler-Chrysler.


Kinja'd!!! For Sweden > mr. idk
08/06/2013 at 14:28

Kinja'd!!!1

Chrysler did make a Crossfire SRT-6. It's still a Crossfire.


Kinja'd!!! PS9 > mr. idk
08/06/2013 at 14:28

Kinja'd!!!0

Chrysler was owned by Daimler once upon a time. What's so outlandish about that?


Kinja'd!!! Buckner > mr. idk
08/06/2013 at 14:28

Kinja'd!!!1

Didn't they hype the whole "german" engineered thing in the commercials? ACTIVE SPOILER! OMG!


Kinja'd!!! Jagvar > mr. idk
08/06/2013 at 14:28

Kinja'd!!!3

The Crossfire and the SLK are the same car under the skin. So yes, a Crossfire SRT-6 is a less-expensive SLK32 AMG.


Kinja'd!!! vdub_nut: scooter snob > mr. idk
08/06/2013 at 14:29

Kinja'd!!!0

The crossfire chassis was a previous generation merc chassis, iirc.


Kinja'd!!! Casper > mr. idk
08/06/2013 at 14:30

Kinja'd!!!2

A Crossfire was just a screwed up SLK. Mercedes did all the engineering, Chrysler just made the weird body design changes.


Kinja'd!!! BeaterGT > mr. idk
08/06/2013 at 14:33

Kinja'd!!!0

Would take a Crossfire SRT over any of those "Kompressors"


Kinja'd!!! mr. idk > PS9
08/06/2013 at 14:34

Kinja'd!!!0

I know that chrysler-daimler were once together, but i didnt think that AMG engines actually found there way into chrysler's cars during the time they were together


Kinja'd!!! mr. idk > For Sweden
08/06/2013 at 14:36

Kinja'd!!!0

Definitely still a crossfire. Although it is still almost sorta kinda cool that they have amg engines imo


Kinja'd!!! Pearson Hurst > mr. idk
08/06/2013 at 14:38

Kinja'd!!!1

I've always kind of likes the SRT-6. I know, it's a sickness. I'll go sit in the corner now...


Kinja'd!!! mr. idk > Pearson Hurst
08/06/2013 at 14:42

Kinja'd!!!0

A sweet kind of sickness. Im sure there not that bad to drive...


Kinja'd!!! pianomanzero > mr. idk
08/06/2013 at 14:51

Kinja'd!!!0

Yeah the crossfire is basically a Mercedes-Benz SLK320 IIRC.


Kinja'd!!! dsigned001 - O.R.C. hunter > mr. idk
08/06/2013 at 16:24

Kinja'd!!!0

While it is kind of cool, it was also pay off what killed the Crossfire. It came out well above where it should have been for its market segment price wise, and it came with Mercedes repair bills instead of Chrysler ones, which pretty much priced it out of competition.
On top of that, no red blooded American wanted to buy it - if they wanted German, they would buy German. They wanted a Chrysler, not a Mercedes.
Chrysler needed to put their turbo four in it, instead they fucked up.


Kinja'd!!! Firewrx234 > mr. idk
08/06/2013 at 16:52

Kinja'd!!!1

The active spoiler came up at 75 mph, screaming to the world around you, "Look! I'm over the speed limit!"


Kinja'd!!! boxrocket > Jagvar
08/06/2013 at 17:29

Kinja'd!!!0

But, importantly, it was the previous-generation SLK that became the crossfire, not the new one that came out around the same time.